Antiphospholipid SyndromeClassification Criteria

Antiphospholipid Syndrome
2023 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria

Checks the entry criterion and scores six clinical and two laboratory domains to classify antiphospholipid syndrome for research, with the sources and limits shown on the page.

Original instrument
Barbhaiya M, Zuily S, Naden R, et al.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2023;82:1258-1270. Published simultaneously in Arthritis & Rheumatology.

Before you use this calculator

This page applies published classification criteria to the findings you enter. It is for research classification and clinical reference, not for diagnosis or treatment decisions. Read these limitations before relying on a result.

  • This is a classification tool, not a diagnostic one. The criteria were built to enroll a homogeneous group of patients in research, and they favor specificity. In the validation cohorts they were 99% specific but only 83% to 84% sensitive, so a patient can need treatment for APS without meeting them.[1]
  • You supply the judgment calls. Whether a finding is otherwise unexplained, whether a thrombosis occurred with a high-risk profile, and whether antibody results are persistent are decisions the calculator cannot make. A wrong input gives a wrong classification.[1][2]
  • Only ELISA titers count for the solid-phase domain. Moderate and high levels are defined on standardized ELISA. Values from automated platforms such as chemiluminescence are not interchangeable, and the authors advise against applying the thresholds to them.[1]
Show the other 8 limitations (11 in total)
  • Validated in referred patients. The two validation cohorts (278 and 275 cases) were patients referred for suspected APS, mostly adults aged 40 and older, predominantly White and female. The authors expect further testing in other groups, such as aPL-positive lupus, non-White patients, children, and non-academic settings.[1]
  • Research rules for repeat tests are not enforced. The paper asks for two consecutive positive results within 3 years in prospective studies, and for two consecutive positives with at least one in the 3 years in retrospective ones. You choose the level, and the calculator takes your word that it was documented properly.[1]
  • Maximum scores are our arithmetic. The paper does not state a maximum. We add the highest level of each domain: 22 clinical and 12 laboratory points.[1]
  • The paper is inconsistent in two places. Table 1 writes the fetal death range as ending at 34 weeks 0 days while Figure 1 says 33 weeks 6 days, and Table 1 writes a high titer as above 80 units while the text and Table 3 say 80 or more. We use before 34 weeks 0 days (as in the appendix) and 80 units or more.[1][2]
  • The 3-year entry window rests mainly on consensus. The authors say the decision was based on limited data and a Steering Committee vote.[1]
  • Some scenarios fall below the threshold on purpose. Examples are an isolated VTE with a high-risk profile, isolated early pregnancy losses, an isolated fetal death, or IgM antibodies alone, each with a laboratory score of 3 or more. The authors list them as a research priority.[1]
  • No treatment advice. The page classifies. It says nothing about anticoagulation or other management.[1]
  • Not affiliated with the authors. This page is an independent implementation of the published criteria and is not endorsed by the ACR, EULAR, or BMJ.

Source: Barbhaiya et al. 2023 (reference 1) and its supplement (reference 2). Interpretations made by AutoimmuneCalc carry no reference number.

How to use it. In each domain choose the highest level that applies to the patient, counting only findings that are otherwise unexplained. Part 1 covers clinical domains, Part 2 the laboratory domains, and Part 3 asks about timing for the entry criterion. Every domain starts at none.

Part 1: Clinical domains

Domain 1: Venous thromboembolism (VTE)none0 pts

Otherwise unexplained VTE confirmed by appropriate testing, such as pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis of the legs or arms, splanchnic, renal vein, cerebral venous, or retinal vein thrombosis. Superficial vein thrombosis is not scored.

High-risk VTE profile: definition (Table 2)

High risk means one or more major or two or more minor risk factors at the time of the event, when the timing and severity fit the event.

Major: active cancer that is untreated, treated without cure intent, under curative treatment (including hormonal therapy), or progressing despite curative treatment; bed-confined hospital admission with an acute illness for at least 3 days within 3 months; major trauma with fractures or spinal cord injury within 1 month; surgery under general, spinal, or epidural anesthesia for more than 30 minutes within 3 months.

Minor (need two): active systemic autoimmune disease or inflammatory bowel disease; acute severe infection; central venous catheter in the same vascular bed; hormone replacement, estrogen-containing contraceptives, or ongoing IVF; travel of 8 hours or more; BMI 30 or higher; pregnancy or up to 6 weeks postpartum; other prolonged immobilization (for example, bed-bound outside hospital for at least 3 days); surgery under general, spinal, or epidural anesthesia for under 30 minutes within 3 months.

Make every effort to find the risk-factor data. If it is truly unknown, use the retrospective option.[1]

Domain 2: Arterial thrombosis (AT)none0 pts

Otherwise unexplained arterial thrombosis confirmed by appropriate testing: myocardial infarction from coronary thrombosis, peripheral, splanchnic, or retinal artery thrombosis, stroke by international definitions, and organ infarcts (kidney, liver, spleen) without a visible thrombus. Transient ischemic attack is not scored.

High-risk CVD profile: definition (Table 2)

High risk means one or more high or three or more moderate cardiovascular risk factors at the time of the event, when the timing and severity fit the event.

High: blood pressure 180/110 mm Hg or higher; chronic kidney disease with eGFR 60 mL/min or lower for more than 3 months; diabetes with organ damage or long duration (type 1 for 20 years or more, type 2 for 10 years or more); severe hyperlipidemia (total cholesterol 310 mg/dL or higher, or LDL above 190 mg/dL).

Moderate (need three): hypertension on treatment or persistent blood pressure of 140/90 or higher; current smoking; diabetes without organ damage and of shorter duration; moderate hyperlipidemia (on treatment, or cholesterol above normal but under the severe limits); BMI 30 or higher.

If the data are unknown, use the retrospective option.[1]

Domain 3: Microvascularnone0 pts

Choose the highest level that applies. Findings must be otherwise unexplained. For an established item, the matching suspected definition must be fulfilled first.

Microvascular definitions (Table 1)

Livedo racemosa: violaceous net-like mottling that is nonuniform, broken, asymmetric, and persistent. Uniform, reversible livedo reticularis is not scored.

Suspected aPL nephropathy: otherwise unexplained persistent new or worsened hypertension, proteinuria of 0.5 g per 24 hours or a protein-to-creatinine ratio of 0.5 mg/mg or more, acute renal failure, or glomerular microscopic hematuria.

Suspected pulmonary hemorrhage: respiratory symptoms plus otherwise unexplained infiltrates on imaging.

Established myocardial disease: otherwise unexplained non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction with normal coronary angiography plus cardiac MRI abnormalities, or small-vessel thrombosis on histology.[1]

Domain 4: Obstetricnone0 pts

Choose the highest level that applies. Findings must be otherwise unexplained, and not better explained by another condition such as lupus.

Preeclampsia and placental insufficiency with severe features (Table 1)

Preeclampsia: blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg or higher on 2 occasions at least 4 hours apart after 20 weeks, with new proteinuria (0.3 mg/mg in a random urine sample, or dipstick 2+ if no quantitative result). Severe features (one or more): blood pressure of 160/110 or higher on 2 occasions; new headache unresponsive to medication; visual disturbances; pulmonary edema; liver enzymes more than twice normal or severe persistent right upper quadrant or epigastric pain; creatinine above 1.1 mg/dL or doubled; platelets below 100 x 10^9/L.

Placental insufficiency: estimated or birth weight below the 10th percentile without a fetal syndrome or genetic cause, plus one or more severe features: abnormal fetal surveillance (for example a nonreactive non-stress test); abnormal Doppler (for example absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery); weight below the 3rd percentile; oligohydramnios (amniotic fluid index 5 cm or less, or deepest pocket under 2 cm).[1]

Domain 5: Cardiac valvenone0 pts

Otherwise unexplained valve disease on echocardiography. Valve dysfunction (regurgitation or stenosis) without thickening or vegetation is not scored.

Domain 6: Hematologynone0 pts

Otherwise unexplained thrombocytopenia.

Part 2: Laboratory domains

Domain 7: Lupus anticoagulant (LAC), coagulation-based assaynone0 pts

Tested and interpreted by the ISTH three-step method (screening, mixing, confirmation) using two screening systems, dRVVT and a sensitive aPTT. Positive if at least one system is positive after all three steps. Results from patients on anticoagulants count only if reviewed by someone with LAC expertise.

Domain 8: Anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta-2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI), solid-phase ELISAnone0 pts

By ELISA only, and persistent (positive on at least 2 occasions at least 12 weeks apart). Moderate is 40 to 79 units and high is 80 units or more. Titers above the laboratory cut-off but below 40 units do not count. IgG and IgM are not added: choose the highest level. If two consecutive results are one moderate and one high, score moderate.

Part 3: Entry criterion (timing)

Timing of the clinical criterion and the positive aPL testnot answered

Was a positive aPL test (lupus anticoagulant, or moderate or high IgG or IgM aCL or anti-β2GPI by ELISA) documented within 3 years of the clinical criterion you scored?

About the 2023 APS classification criteria

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease in which persistent antiphospholipid antibodies accompany arterial, venous, or microvascular thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity, or other manifestations. For research, APS had been classified with the Sapporo criteria of 1999, revised in 2006, which the authors criticized for lumping together patients with very different risk profiles[1].

The 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria replace that with an entry criterion and a weighted, additive system in which the strength of each clinical finding and each antibody result matters. Their stated goal was the highest possible specificity, so that studies and trials enroll patients in whom APS is very likely[1].

How the scoring works

Entry criterion. At least one documented clinical criterion (domains 1 to 6) and a positive aPL test within 3 years of it. If it is absent, do not classify.[1]

Additive criteria. Points are added across the eight domains, counting only the highest-weighted item in each. Classify as APS with at least 3 points from the clinical domains and at least 3 from the laboratory domains.[1]

DomainLevels and points
1. VTEWith high-risk profile 1. Without 3.
2. Arterial thrombosisWith high-risk profile 2. Without 4.
3. MicrovascularSuspected 2. Established 5.
4. ObstetricThree or more early losses, or a fetal death at 16 to under 34 weeks alone 1. Preeclampsia or placental insufficiency with severe features 3. Both 4.
5. Cardiac valveThickening 2. Vegetation 4.
6. HematologyPlatelets 20 to 130 x 10^9/L 2.
7. Lupus anticoagulantSingle positive 1. Persistent 5.
8. aCL and anti-β2GPI ELISAIgM only 1. IgG moderate 4. IgG high, one antibody 5. IgG high, both antibodies 7.
Worked examples.
1. Unprovoked deep vein thrombosis with no high-risk profile scores 3 in domain 1. A persistent lupus anticoagulant scores 5 in domain 7. With the tests within 3 years, that is 3 clinical and 5 laboratory points, so the patient is classified as having APS.
2. A DVT after a long hospital stay (high-risk profile) scores 1, and echocardiographic valve thickening scores 2, giving 3 clinical points. IgG anticardiolipin at 60 units (moderate) scores 4. Classified.
3. The same hospital-associated DVT alone scores 1 clinical point. Even with IgG antibodies high against both targets (7 laboratory points), the patient is not classified, because the clinical side is below 3.

What the result means

ResultMeaning
Entry criterion not metNo clinical criterion, no qualifying positive aPL test, or the two more than 3 years apart. The criteria should not be applied.[1]
Below the thresholdThe entry criterion is met but clinical points or laboratory points are under 3. The patient is not classified as having APS for research. This does not rule out clinical APS.[1]
Classified as APSEntry criterion met with at least 3 clinical and at least 3 laboratory points. In validation, the criteria were 99% specific against expert consensus.[1]

In the validation cohorts, the revised Sapporo criteria were more sensitive (100% and 99%) but less specific (91% and 86%) than the 2023 criteria (83% and 84% sensitive, 99% specific)[1].

What “otherwise unexplained” means

A clinical criterion is not scored when another cause is equally or more likely than APS, in the investigator’s judgment. The paper’s supplement lists examples for each item. The list is not exhaustive[2].

ItemExamples of equally or more likely causes
Venous thromboembolismThoracic outlet syndrome with venous compression and upper-extremity thrombosis; genetic thrombophilia. (The traditional VTE risk factors used for scoring are not reasons for exclusion.)
Arterial thrombosisThoracic outlet syndrome with arterial compression and upper-extremity arterial thrombosis; atrial fibrillation. (The cardiovascular risk factors used for scoring are not reasons for exclusion.)
Livedoid vasculopathy lesionsGenetic thrombophilia such as protein C or S deficiency; systemic autoimmune disease; solid-organ or hematologic cancer.
aPL nephropathy (laboratory)Active lupus nephritis; acute renal artery or vein thrombosis; diabetes; malignant hypertension; reduced renal perfusion or volume loss; infection; medications including NSAIDs, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, some antimicrobials, chemotherapy, calcineurin inhibitors, and contrast.
Pulmonary hemorrhage (symptoms and imaging)Pulmonary infection, vasculitis, toxic exposure, or congestive heart failure.
Pulmonary hemorrhage (lavage or pathology)ANCA-associated or drug-induced vasculitis, other systemic autoimmune disease, cryoglobulinemia, bone marrow transplant, anti-GBM disease, or IgA vasculitis.
Myocardial diseaseOther systemic autoimmune diseases such as systemic sclerosis or vasculitis.
Adrenal hemorrhage or plexus thrombosisSepsis; medications such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Pre-fetal death (before 10 weeks)Known genetic abnormalities of the pregnancy, uterine malformations, poorly controlled maternal diabetes or thyroid disease, parental karyotype abnormalities.
Fetal deathFetal anomalies or genetic abnormalities, feto-maternal hemorrhage, umbilical cord accidents, placental abruption, preterm rupture of membranes, congenital infection, chorioamnionitis, red cell alloimmunization.
Valve thickeningActive lupus; rheumatic fever.
Valve vegetationActive lupus; cancer; infective endocarditis.
ThrombocytopeniaActive lupus; pseudothrombocytopenia; medications (myelosuppressive drugs, chemotherapy, heparin); radiation; gestational thrombocytopenia; chronic alcohol use; liver disease; splenomegaly; severe infection or sepsis; primary hematologic cancer.

Common pitfalls

Adding every finding in a domain. Only the highest-weighted item in each domain counts. Two microvascular findings are still 2 points if both are suspected-level.
Counting titers below 40 units. Results above the cut-off but under 40 units do not count toward the criteria, and with a negative lupus anticoagulant they do not meet the entry criterion either.[2]
Using automated-platform values as ELISA units. Chemiluminescent and multiplex results do not map directly to 40 and 80 ELISA units.[1]
Trusting a lupus anticoagulant drawn on anticoagulants. Results from patients on anticoagulants are used only when reviewed by someone with expertise. Tests done off anticoagulation take priority.[1]
Scoring items the criteria dropped. Superficial vein thrombosis, transient ischemic attack, livedo reticularis, and valve dysfunction without thickening or vegetation are not scored.[1][2]

Frequently asked questions

What are the 2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria?

A points-based system for identifying patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) for research. A patient first has to meet an entry criterion: at least one documented clinical criterion and a positive antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) test within 3 years of each other. Then points are added from six clinical domains and two laboratory domains, each weighted from 1 to 7, and the patient is classified as having APS with at least 3 clinical and at least 3 laboratory points. The criteria were published in 2023 by the ACR/EULAR APS Classification Criteria Collaborators.

Are these criteria used to diagnose APS?

No. Classification criteria define groups for studies and trials and intentionally favor specificity. In the two validation cohorts the criteria had a specificity of 99% and a sensitivity of 83% and 84%, compared with 91% and 86% specificity and 100% and 99% sensitivity for the 2006 revised Sapporo criteria. A patient can have clinical APS and not meet them, and the result should not be used by itself to start or withhold treatment.

What is the entry criterion?

At least one documented clinical criterion from domains 1 to 6, plus a positive aPL test (lupus anticoagulant, or moderate-to-high IgG or IgM anticardiolipin or anti-beta-2-glycoprotein I by ELISA) within 3 years of the clinical criterion. If the entry criterion is not met, the criteria should not be applied.

How are the domains scored?

The domains are additive, but within each domain only the highest-weighted criterion counts. A clinical criterion should not be counted when another explanation is equally or more likely than APS.

What is a high-risk VTE or CVD profile, and why does it matter?

A thrombosis that happened alongside strong provoking factors is less specific for APS, so it scores less. For venous events a high-risk profile is one major or two minor VTE risk factors, and for arterial events it is one high or three moderate cardiovascular risk factors, based on the situation at the time of the event. VTE scores 1 with a high-risk profile and 3 without, and arterial thrombosis scores 2 with and 4 without.

What antibody levels count as moderate and high?

On standardized ELISA, moderate is 40 to 79 units and high is 80 units or more. Results above the laboratory cut-off but below 40 units are not scored. IgG and IgM are not added together, and IgM alone is worth only 1 point.

What does persistent mean for antiphospholipid antibodies?

Positive on at least two occasions at least 12 weeks apart. A single positive lupus anticoagulant scores 1 point, while a persistent one scores 5.

What if the patient has lupus or another autoimmune disease?

A patient with another systemic autoimmune disease can still be classified as having APS. The paper says individual criteria should not be scored when the other disease is an equally or more likely cause, for example preeclampsia that is as likely due to lupus, or thrombocytopenia during active lupus.

How was this calculator checked?

Weights, definitions, and thresholds were taken from Figure 1 and Tables 1 to 3 of the paper and from its supplementary sections, then tested against every possible combination of selections (all 64,800) using a separate calculation. Every place where we interpret the paper is stated under the limitations.

References

  1. 1Barbhaiya M, Zuily S, Naden R, et al., on behalf of the ACR/EULAR APS Classification Criteria Collaborators. 2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82:1258-1270. doi:10.1136/ard-2023-224609. Published simultaneously in Arthritis & Rheumatology. Source of the entry criterion, weights, thresholds (Figure 1, Table 3), definitions (Tables 1 and 2), and validation results (Table 5).
  2. 2Barbhaiya M, et al. Supplementary sections to the 2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 (online supplement). Source of the per-item descriptions of “otherwise unexplained” (Section 4), the consensus decisions (Section 5), and the entry-criteria analysis (Section 7).
  3. 3Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(2):295-306. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.x. The revised Sapporo criteria that the 2023 criteria were compared with, cited in reference 1. This paper was not reviewed directly for this page.
  4. 4Devreese KMJ, de Groot PG, de Laat B, et al. Guidance from the Scientific and Standardization Committee for lupus anticoagulant/antiphospholipid antibodies of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis: update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection and interpretation. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18:2828-2839. The lupus anticoagulant testing guidance that the criteria follow, cited in reference 1. This paper was not reviewed directly for this page.

Related calculators

Source and credit. The criteria were developed by the ACR/EULAR APS Classification Criteria Collaborators (Barbhaiya, Zuily, and colleagues). The article is copyrighted by its authors or their employers with a notice of no commercial re-use, and the original article is the authoritative source. AutoimmuneCalc is an independent site and is not affiliated with or endorsed by the ACR, EULAR, or BMJ.
For clinical decision support only. This calculator classifies for research and does not replace clinical judgment or specialist evaluation. It gives no treatment advice. See the medical disclaimer and editorial policy.

Page history. October 15, 2026: page published.

Points: clinical and laboratory
0
of 22
clinical, need 3
0
of 12
laboratory, need 3
Select findings to begin
Select findings to begin
Entry criterion
Not assessed
Choose findings in Parts 1 and 2, then answer the timing question in Part 3.
Points by domain
1. VTE0
2. Arterial thrombosis0
3. Microvascular0
4. Obstetric0
5. Cardiac valve0
6. Hematology0
7. Lupus anticoagulant0
8. aCL / anti-β2GPI ELISA0
Reviewed by Mahiar Rabie, MS, MD · AutoimmuneCalc · Last reviewed October 15, 2026